Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric evaluation of the Texas revised inventory of grief in a sample of bereaved family caregivers.
Sophiahemmet högskola.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2074-5985
Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Department of Health Care Sciences. Capio Palliativ vård Dalen.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2711-0245
Lunds universitet.
Göteborgs universitet.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Research in Nursing & Health, ISSN 0160-6891, E-ISSN 1098-240X, Vol. 41, no 5, p. 480-488Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG) was developed to measure the intensity of grief after the death of a close person. It consists of two scales: TRIG I (past behaviors) and TRIG II (present feelings). Because of inconsistencies in previous validations, the instrument needs to be further validated, hence the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the TRIG in a sample of bereaved family caregivers in Sweden. The TRIG was translated to Swedish according to standard principles, and 129 bereaved family caregivers completed the questionnaire. Parallel analysis was used to decide the number of factors to extract, followed by confirmatory factor analysis. An ordinal version of Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scales. Construct validity was tested against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The factor analyses resulted in one factor being retained for both scales. The internal consistency was excellent (α > 0.9) for both scales. Construct validity was supported by strong correlations between TRIG I and TRIG II as well as moderate correlations between the TRIG scales and HADS. In conclusion, the TRIG has sound psychometric qualities and the two scales should be treated as unidimensional measures of grief. Hence, the instrument is suited to be used in the context of palliative care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 41, no 5, p. 480-488
Keywords [en]
Caregivers, Death and dying, Grief/mourning, Instrument development and Validation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:esh:diva-7100DOI: 10.1002/nur.21886PubMedID: 30311668OAI: oai:DiVA.org:esh-7100DiVA, id: diva2:1262915
Available from: 2018-11-13 Created: 2018-11-13 Last updated: 2023-10-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Holm, MajaAlvariza, Anette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holm, MajaAlvariza, Anette
By organisation
Department of Health Care Sciences
In the same journal
Research in Nursing & Health
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 117 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf