Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identifying no-harm incidents in home healthcare: a cohort study using trigger tool methodology
Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Department of Health Care Sciences. Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8246-9168
Karolinska institutet; Karolinska universitetssjukhuset.
Linköpings universitet.
Linnéuniversitetet.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 20, no 1, p. 1-11, article id 289Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Patient safety in home healthcare is largely unexplored. No-harm incidents may give valuable information about risk areas and system failures as a source for proactive patient safety work. We hypothesized that it would be feasible to retrospectively identify no-harm incidents and thus aimed to explore the cumulative incidence, preventability, types, and potential contributing causes of no-harm incidents that affected adult patients admitted to home healthcare.

Methods: A structured retrospective record review using a trigger tool designed for home healthcare. A random sample of 600 home healthcare records from ten different organizations across Sweden was reviewed.

Results: In the study, 40,735 days were reviewed. In all, 313 no-harm incidents affected 177 (29.5%) patients; of these, 198 (63.2%) no-harm incidents, in 127 (21.2%) patients, were considered preventable. The most common no-harm incident types were “fall without harm,” “deficiencies in medication management,” and “moderate pain.” The type “deficiencies in medication management” was deemed to have a preventability rate twice as high as those of “fall without harm” and “moderate pain.” The most common potential contributing cause was “deficiencies in nursing care and treatment, i.e., delayed, erroneous, omitted or incomplete treatment or care.”

Conclusion: This study suggests that it is feasible to identify no-harm incidents and potential contributing causes such as omission of care using record review with a trigger tool adapted to the context. No-harm incidents and potential contributing causes are valuable sources of knowledge for improving patient safety, as they highlight system failures and indicate risks before an adverse event reach the patient.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 20, no 1, p. 1-11, article id 289
Keywords [en]
No-harm incident, Trigger tool, Retrospective record review, Home healthcare, Patient safety
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:esh:diva-8139DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05139-zISI: 000526920000010PubMedID: 32252755Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85083071769OAI: oai:DiVA.org:esh-8139DiVA, id: diva2:1431135
Funder
Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), 470161Region Östergötland, LiO-537211Available from: 2020-05-06 Created: 2020-05-19 Last updated: 2023-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindblad, Marléne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindblad, Marléne
By organisation
Department of Health Care Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf