Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Symposium Abstract #1: How do we understand time and change?: Five approaches to longitudinal qualitative research in nursing
Mittuniversitetet.
Ersta Sköndal University College, Department of Health Care Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2135-2684
2016 (English)In: Abstracts, Oral Presentations for Qualitative Methods Conference, May 2016: Symposium: Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis—How Can It Be Done?, 2016, p. 4-4Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Longitudinal qualitative research can give us new insights in social processes and experiences over time. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in conducting longitudinal qualitative research. However, the definition of what constitutes a longitudinal data presentation is unclear, the methodological literature scarce, and the variation of procedures great. Therefore, we undertook a review of longitudinal qualitative articles within the nursing field to identify and describe various types of qualitative longitudinal approaches. In this presentation, the five identified types of longitudinal qualitative approaches will be presented. In total, a large part of the papers described as having a longitudinal design in fact only performed a longitudinal data collection and did not integrate ideas of time or change in their analysis or results. This practice will be problematized and a definition for longitudinal qualitative research will be proposed. Three fruitful approaches to analyzing longitudinal qualitative data were identified: pool-, phase-, and pattern-oriented approaches. These practices focus upon different aspects of time, change, process, and context, thus presenting different kinds of results. A discussion of the pros and cons of these three practices will be held so researchers can make a more informed decision when choosing which approach they will take when analyzing longitudinal material.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. p. 4-4
Series
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, E-ISSN 1609-4069 ; Volume: 15 issue: 1
Keywords [en]
Qualitative method, Research evaluation, Longitudinal design
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:esh:diva-8381DOI: 10.1177/1609406916672113ISI: 000389921700490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:esh-8381DiVA, id: diva2:1475717
Conference
15th Qualitative Methods Conference, Glasgow, May 3-5, 2016
Available from: 2020-10-13 Created: 2020-10-13 Last updated: 2021-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Kneck, Åsa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kneck, Åsa
By organisation
Department of Health Care Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 219 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf